The study analysed the impacts on the SDGs of four different scenarios compatible with the Paris Agreement. These scenarios include combinations of large-scale deployment of solar and wind energy facilities, reforestation strategies, carbon capture and storage technologies, energy crops and behavioural changes.
- Bioenergy & Capture: The world relies on bioenergy and technologies to remove carbon from the atmosphere. This scenario may lead to increased water use for bio-crops, increased water stress and higher water prices.
- Forest & Fossils: The world relies on afforestation and large-scale deployment of carbon removal technologies. This strategy can lead to competition for land, increasing water and food prices.
- Electrification & Conservation: A scenario based on rapid electrification, large-scale solar and wind deployment and limited bioenergy implies higher carbon prices to encourage renewables, which would, in turn, increase fertiliser costs and therefore food prices.
- Lesser & Greener: Encouraging people to adopt more sustainable behaviours in their diets, transport choices and consumption patterns brings only moderate increases in water and food prices.
Results suggest that if mitigation depends largely on supply-side solutions, more natural resources are required, which may negatively interact with other elements of the SDG Agenda such as food and water prices. By promoting sustainable lifestyles, these impacts can be reduced and a just transition can be achieved by ensuring that vulnerable populations have access to water and food supplies.